Eating
fruit and vegetables could be good for your mental health. This post explores
the evidence, arguing that better surveys need to be carried out if we are to
accurately establish causality. If we can understand how mental health is
linked to diet, the benefits to the public – and those who decide public policy
– could be huge.
Public
health policy has an enormous impact on national wellbeing (Delaney, Smith and
McGovern 2011). A study recently published in Social Indicators Research
(Blanchflower, Oswald and Stewart-Brown 2012) investigated the relationship
between fruit and vegetable consumption and mental health. The study drew upon
three robust, representative, cross-sectional studies of random samples of
adults in three UK countries; England, Scotland, and Wales. Each of these
surveys gathered self-reported intake data, measured in portions of fruit and
vegetables of up to eight or more a day. Most surveys stop at the recommended
five or more. The study also gathered data on seven different measures of
mental health, from mental wellbeing (WEMWBS) through mental illness (GHQ-12),
life satisfaction, happiness, nervousness and downheartedness.
Together
these surveys captured information from more than 80,000 people, taking account
of a wide range of other potential explanatory factors such as age, sex, ethnic
group, socioeconomic and educational circumstances; and other lifestyle
factors, such as smoking. They show a remarkably monotonic dose-response
relationship between mental health and the number of portions of fruit and
vegetables consumed. That is, the more fruit and vegetables consumed, the
greater the mental wellbeing. In models based on indicators of positive mental
health (WEMWBS, Life Satisfaction and Happiness) the corresponding coefficients
continued to increase by up to seven or more portions of fruit and vegetables.
In models based on mental health problems (GHQ-12, nervousness, feeling
downhearted) they increased by up to five or more.
Establishing causality?
A
strong and consistent dose-response relationship, as shown in these studies,
acts as evidence that fruit and vegetable consumption is influencing mental
health. Yet, the possibility remains that we could just be documenting a simple
correlation; people with better mental health tend to look after themselves –
by eating more fruit and vegetables – than those worse mental health.
Traditionally,
public health researchers strengthen evidence for causality by analysing cohort
studies. Cohort studies allow us to see whether the putative cause (fruit and
vegetable consumption) precedes the putative effect (mental health). This
approach gets round what is known as ‘recall bias’ in which individuals who
have a problem, such as depression, reflect on possible causes and may
therefore be more accurate reporters of their dietary intake. Cohort studies
depend on the right data being gathered and, until recently, few of these
studies have collected good data on diet. Even fewer have included measures of
mental wellbeing, as opposed to mental illness. With cross-sectional data as
strong as this, in an area of great relevance to public health policy,
longitudinal or cohort studies will soon be carried out. Yet, even these may not
be definitive.
How do fruit and vegetables
influence mental health?
The
main mechanism through which fruit and vegetable consumption is likely to
influence mental health is through the absorption of water-soluble minerals
such as potassium (Torres, Nowson and Worsley 2009) and vitamins such as folic
acid (Gilbody, Lewis and Lightfoot 2007; Gilbody, Lightfoot and Sheldon 2007;
Fava et al. 1997) which have an impact on adrenaline and serotonin receptors.
This may create problems for anyone wanting to prove causality. Water-soluble
vitamins and minerals are not stored in the body in the same way as fat
soluble vitamins; reserves last for months not years. Intake at one point in
time would not therefore be expected to have an influence on health at a later
date. What would matter with regard to fruit and vegetable consumption is
current or very recent intake, which would be measured in cross-sectional
studies.
Conclusions
If
it could be shown that fruit and vegetable consumption made a difference to how
happy people felt, public health messages to increase their consumption would
probably be greatly enhanced. We already know that increasing fruit and
vegetable consumption would meet a wide range of public health goals including
reducing cardiovascular disease and cancer. If it proved that consumption also
improved mental health, the imperative to do something about inadequate dietary
patterns in the UK would be greatly strengthened. If it could be shown for
certain that five portions a day was not optimal for mental health, public
health messages would also need to change. The point is that with the evidence
that is available from the Social Indicators Research study it is possible to
claim that fruit and vegetable consumption is good for your mental health. However,
we urgently need prospective supplementation studies to further investigate
this likelihood and, ultimately, to prove things one way or another.
References
Blanchflower
D G, A J Oswald and S Stewart-Brown (2012), “Is psychological wellbeing linked
to the consumption of fruit and vegetables”, Social Indicators Research,
e-publication, 11 October. DOI10.1007s/11205-012-0173-y.
Delaney,
Liam, James P Smith and Mark McGovern (2011), “Improving
child health reduces disability and health inequalities among adults: Evidence
from Ireland”, VoxEU.org, 23 October.
Fava
M, J S Borus, J E Alpert, A A Nierenberg, J F Rosenbaum and T Bottiglieri
(1997), “Folate, vitamin B-12 and Homocysteine in major depressive disorder”, American
Psychiatry, 154, 462-428.
Gaweesh
S and A A Ewies (2009), “Folic acid supplementation cures hot flushes in
postmenopausal women”, Med Hypotheses, 29 September.
Gilbody
S, S Lewis and T Lightfoot (2007), "Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase
(MTHFR) genetic polymorphisms and psychiatric disorders: a HuGE review". American
Journal of Epidemiology, 165 (1), 1–13, doi:10.1093/aje/kwj347, PMID
17074966.
Gilbody
S, T Lightfoot and T Sheldon (2007), "Is low folate a risk factor for
depression? A meta‐analysis and exploration of heterogeneity", Journal
of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61(7), 631–637.
doi:10.1136/jech.2006.050385, PMC 2465760, PMID 17568057.
Torres
S J, C A Nowson and A Worsley (2009), “Dietary electrolytes are related to
mood”, British Journal of Nutrition, 100(5),1038-45.
No comments:
Post a Comment